Avvo and FindLaw vs Google Ads Comparison

Is it Worth Advertising With Avvo, FindLaw, or Google Ads?

Our comparison of Avvo and FindLaw vs Google Ads shows no comparison. Google Ads is the clear winner and only contender.

My personal injury law firm advertised with Avvo for several years and still did at the time I wrote this article.

We also signed a one-year advertising agreement with Martindale Hubbell but to be fair, I didn’t spend enough time setting up our profiles.

We have been advertising with Google Ads for a couple of years since giving up on Avvo. See our results with Google Ads for personal injury lawyers. We have a distinct advantage with Google Ads but even without that advantage, Google Ads is the clear winner.

Our Experience With Avvo

We monopolized motorcycle ads on Avvo within a large area approximately 150 miles across. We were at the top of a three-pack of ads in most of the areas near us and kept taking more areas as they were given up. It seemed like a great deal because motorcycle ads on Avvo were very cheap and motorcycle cases are worth more than most other personal injury cases.

Avvo used to yield little results but was worthwhile because of the value of motorcycle accident cases and the low cost of Avvo ads. We got some leads that weren’t viable cases but at least they were legitimate leads. We retained good 3 cases from Avvo in the first two years.

We stopped advertising with Avvo because in the last two years with Avvo, we didn’t retain any cases. Avvo just stopped working. When Avvo was working, it was nowhere near as effective as our law firm website, other advertising, and marketing media.

I also had a paid Pro profile listing on Avvo with a 10 rating and my profile indicates that my law practice is 50% personal injury and 50% motorcycle accident cases. These factors should have increased the probability of a motorcycle accident client contacting me through Avvo.

After discontinuing advertising with Avvo, I also stopped paying for the Pro membership on Avvo because they removed the Pro designation.

Our Avvo rep was surprised we were giving up our ads because we get so many calls and emails. But all the calls and emails were from salespeople or potential personal injury clients who had no case and already called every lawyer they could.

The screen capture below shows an example of the emails we get.

avvo lead from potential personal injury client


Why Aren’t Avvo and FindLaw Still Effective?

Avvo, FindLaw, and other attorney directories are no longer immediately visible when someone searches for a personal injury lawyer. Sometimes they are difficult to find and with voice search, they can’t be found at all. But Google Ads can always be found.

Avvo and FindLaw used to have a chance in the organic search results when there were three Google Ads above the natural search results. But Google added the local map above the natural search results and now the local map has ads.

Today, Google Ads has simply crowded out their competition. FindLaw Is well aware of the problem. My FindLaw rep admitted this to me. Furthermore, recognizing this, FindLaw now recommends and offers Google Ad campaign management.

Desktop Computers

On a desktop computer, the organic search results are now below the fold so someone looking for a personal injury lawyer won’t see the top organic search results without scrolling down below the ads. On my computer, I had to scroll down below the fold to see Avvo.

The screenshot below of my desktop computer shows that only the ads were seen on the screen. On some monitors, someone may also see the map but will have to scroll down to see the natural search results.

Mobile Search

The problem also exists on mobile. Most people search for a personal injury lawyer on their smartphone. Our results with Google Ads revealed 92.3% of clicks came from smartphones; 5.1% from desktops; and 2.6% from tablets.

Percent of searches on smartphone vs desktop

92.3% of Google Ad clicks from people searching for a personal injury lawyer came from smartphones (red). 5.1% Desktop searches (blue); 2.6% tablets (orange).

On a smartphone, Google Ads take up the entire screen. Below the Ads are the map, local listings, questions, and then organic search results.

I had to swipe my screen 3 times to get to the natural search results with LegalMatch at the bottom of the screen; 4 times to see FindLaw, and 5 times to see Justia and Avvo.

Google search for personal injury lawyers on smartphone

Mobile Voice Search

But the problem gets worse on mobile with Google voice search where Avvo, Findlaw, Justia, and LegalMatch can’t be found.

The number of people using voice search to find local businesses is skyrocketing because it works really well and it’s so easy. According to dialogtech.com, “65% of 25-49 year-olds speak to their voice-enabled devices at least once per day.”

Below is a screenshot of what Google shows when I asked Google to “find a personal injury lawyer near me”. Google showed its local business listings and it’s not even possible to scroll down the screen to find natural search results. Google didn’t even show Google Ads but they are now selling Google Ads in the local business listings.

If you’re not in Google local business listings, you won’t be found when someone does a voice search for a personal injury lawyer.

Screenshot showing result when asking Google for "personal injury lawyer near me"

This is the screen shown on my phone after a Google voice search to “find a personal injury lawyer near me”. Users cannot scroll down to see any other results.

Avvo and Findlaw vs Google Ads

Nothing can compete with Google Ads for personal injury lawyers because, well, Google owns the ad space.

While Avvo returned more than it cost in the first two years, it was no match against Google Ads even when Avvo was working and it’s not working now.

When people search on Google for a personal injury lawyer, they can click on your Google Ad or call button and reach you directly.

When people reach you through Avvo, FindLaw, Justia or LegalMatch they have to:

  1. Search on Google for a personal injury lawyer;
  2. Scroll down the Google results page past the ads, map, and local listings;
  3. Click on a link to Avvo, FindLaw or one of the other lawyer directories;
  4. After clicking on one of the lawyer directories they have to search for a lawyer all over again.

This is the Avvo search page someone will find after clicking on the link to Avvo. From here, hopefully, someone will search in your city and find your ad on Avvo.

Avvo search page

After searching in Google and clicking on Avvo, someone will have to search a second time on Avvo where maybe they will find your ad on Avvo

Advantages of Google Ads

  • People find you directly on Google
  • People don’t have to search twice
  • Your ad gets seen while organic search results usually don’t
  • Works immediately – you will get cases within days
  • Get as many or as few cases as you want
  • Pause your advertising when you want

Disadvantages of Google Ads

  • Requires a larger advertising budget than Avvo or FindLaw

Advantages of Avvo, FindLaw & Other Lawyer Directories

  • Inexpensive
  • Gives you added exposure

Disadvantages of Avvo, FindLaw & Other Lawyer Directories

  • You can’t get as many cases as you want
  • It’s difficult for people to find you

Comparison of Avvo, Lawyers.com, FindLaw, Super Lawyers, Justia & Yelp

Interested to know which of these lawyer directories have higher rankings in the Google organic search results? Everest Legal Marketing compares the Google search results for the top legal directories and provides the results annually.

Their results show that FindLaw is the clear winner, especially for personal injury lawyers. You can see a graphic of their results in Los Angeles and you can download an Excel file with the results for Houston, Chicago, New York, and Jacksonville.

Improve Your Results from Google Ads, Avvo, FindLaw, Justia or LegalMatch

Whether your advertising with Google Ads, Avvo, FindLaw, Justia, or LegalMatch, you can improve results by using a vanity phone number in your online ads.

Improve Your Results from Google Ads

If you’re advertising with Google Ads or plan to, read 3 Tips Will Save a Fortune With Google Ads In 3 Minutes

What’s Your Experience With Avvo, FindLaw, Justia, LegalMatch, Google Ads or Others

If you have had a good experience with Avvo, FindLaw, Justia, LegalMatch or any other legal directory, please post a comment about it here. Please also post a comment if you have not done well or if you have any other information you can provide to compare Avvo and FindLaw vs Google Ads.

This entry was posted in Online by . Bookmark the permalink.


Philip L. Franckel, Esq. is one of the Personal Injury Dream Team™ Partners at 1-800-HURT-911® New York; He has a 10 Avvo rating; Avvo Client's Choice with all 5-star reviews; Avvo Top Contributor; and a former Member of the Board of Directors of the New York State Trial Lawyers Association. Mr. Franckel is well-known in New York for representing motorcyclists and created the motorcycle awareness campaign BE AWARE MOTORCYCLES ARE EVERYWHERE®.

3 thoughts on “Avvo and FindLaw vs Google Ads Comparison

  1. I am curious as to what your take is on LegalMatch as well as platforms such as that example Nolo. Mainly LegalMatch platform? Its very different it seems from FindLaw and directory sites?

  2. I know about LegalMatch from a long time ago, so I can’t say anything relevant about it today and I don’t have any experience with Nolo. We had used Avvo extensively but it stopped working years ago after Google started morphing into the yellow pages and pushing organic results below the fold when a searcher is looking for a service business like lawyers. A Findlaw salesperson came here trying to sell us and when I mentioned the Google issue, even he admitted that it was a problem.

    We have been getting free leads for a year or two from a large well-known website (I would rather not mention it here). Those leads are the same leads provided to paying members but they make us wait an hour before we can have the lead’s contact info. Paying members get the info first. I have two problems with that:

    1) The leads are not exclusive
    2) Only one or two of all of the leads sounded like worthwhile cases. Most are for things like bed bugs, food poisoning, and my doctor did something and now I have a problem.

    We bought leads from a roving truck for a couple of years but that didn’t turn out well either. We discovered that some leads were fake and others were given to other lawyers at the same time or before us.

    My partner and I like Google Ads. We do very well with it and it is easy to predict what we will get out of it. Google is not cheap but it’s fair and the leads are exclusive. While potential clients may click on more than one ad and call other lawyers, it’s a small issue.

    With Google Ads, you need to be very careful when designing the ad title and ad body so it immediately stands out and makes someone want to click on it. If your ad gets more clicks than competitors, Google rewards your ad with higher placement and a lower cost. We have a huge advantage because we use 1-800-HURT-911® in the ad title. It does both, makes the ad immediately stand out, and makes someone want to click on it. You can see our results when using 1-800-HURT-911® in Google Ads .

    We get a lot of companies trying to sell us leads from the Internet but we never bought them because they’re not predictable and Google Ads is. If a service offered us a month to try it without paying upfront, we would but no one who called us was willing to do that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.